Dr Inventor ICCC Show Analogy

Analogy with Inferences ← Back to List for Target.

Inferences combine information from the target paper (blue) with the source paper (orange).

Search Strategies and the Creative Process (Year 2010) PDF Inferences Show Both PDFs Intentionally Generating Choices in Interactive Narratives (Year 2015) PDF
The human creative process can be likened to searching for solutions to a problem. This work introduces a computerized aesthetic composition task that is inspired by the " creativity as search " metaphor. Data from this technique can illuminate how personality and situational influences a↵ect the creative process, rather than merely noting that they a↵ect the outcome. Beyond this, the technique can be used to highlight underlying similarities between human creativity and optimization, as well as the important di↵erences. Early results with N = 34 participants suggest that people's search strategies do di↵er, and show connections between personality, evaluation criteria, and search strategy. Suggestions for future research are given.
The architecture will enables to do this work.

This work will presents the architecture.

The "" creativity as search "" metaphor will be the player.

Interactive stories face a famous " authorial bottleneck. " Two existing approaches to this problem are story management systems, such as drama managers, and interactive narrative generators. Existing work leverages well-understood qualities of linear narrative such as suspense to generate content, but interactivity brings new capacities, like the ability to make a player experience regret. These interactive poetics arise from the player's ability to make choices, and depend heavily on the structure of the choices that are presented to the player. This system description paper presents a system that creates choices by reasoning about their structure, and describes the architecture that enables it to do so.

Search Strategies and the Creative Process (Year 2010) PDF	Inferences Show Both PDFs	Intentionally Generating Choices in Interactive Narratives (Year 2015) PDF
The human creative process can be likened to searching for solutions to a problem. This work introduces a computerized aesthetic composition task that is inspired by the " creativity as search " metaphor. Data from this technique can illuminate how personality and situational influences a↵ect the creative process, rather than merely noting that they a↵ect the outcome. Beyond this, the technique can be used to highlight underlying similarities between human creativity and optimization, as well as the important di↵erences. Early results with N = 34 participants suggest that people's search strategies do di↵er, and show connections between personality, evaluation criteria, and search strategy. Suggestions for future research are given.	The architecture will enables to do this work. This work will presents the architecture. The "" creativity as search "" metaphor will be the player.	Interactive stories face a famous " authorial bottleneck. " Two existing approaches to this problem are story management systems, such as drama managers, and interactive narrative generators. Existing work leverages well-understood qualities of linear narrative such as suspense to generate content, but interactivity brings new capacities, like the ability to make a player experience regret. These interactive poetics arise from the player's ability to make choices, and depend heavily on the structure of the choices that are presented to the player. This system description paper presents a system that creates choices by reasoning about their structure, and describes the architecture that enables it to do so.

Key Mapped Terms

Target Node Source Node
introduce present
work paper_it
task_that system_that_their
be create
creativity choice_that

Target Node	Source Node
introduce	present
work	paper_it
task_that	system_that_their
be	create
creativity	choice_that

We would appreciate if you could give your thoughts on the analogy above by filling in the following evaluation form.

Explore this analogy in greater detail?

You may explore the analogy between larger portions of these papers, or even between the full papers. This may take up to 30 minutes to calculate as there maybe a lot of inferences and mappings.